Frozen Fever and Cinderella (2015)

Haha so I just got to see the new Frozen short today, along with Disney’s new live-action, Cinderella, which I gave a chance since critics seemed to dig it. Here’s what I thought of both.

FrozenFeverTitle

The premise of Frozen Fever is pretty simple: Elsa gets “sick” but is trying to throw Anna an awesome birthday party. The whole cast is back: Kristen Bell, Idina Menzel, and Josh Gad all reprising their beloved roles as Anna, Elsa, and Olaf. And that’s really important because Frozen Fever relies more so on its well-established characters than story to fill up its albeit limited running time with gags and laughs. It’s cute and fun, but lacks the real emotional punch of the better Pixar shorts, and even from the Frozen movie itself. This isn’t to say Disney is incapable of making great shorts, as demonstrated by Feast which preceded Big Hero 6 and fan favorite Paperman. It’s just to say that returning directors Chris Buck and Jennifer Lee aimed more for entertainment than emotion, which is completely fine by me in a short.

FrozenFeverStill1

As it was an integral piece of the puzzle for Frozen’s unsuspecting success back in 2013, music plays a big role in moving Frozen Fever along at a brisk pace, replacing most of the character’s dialogue. The song, “Making Today a Perfect Day,” starts off really good, reminding me of a deleted Frozen song, “Life’s Too Short.” It’s reference to the mega-hit song, Let It Go, is absolutely hilarious, and garnered universal laughs at the theater I saw it in. However, it gets a little too goofy for my personal liking as the song goes on, with the lyrics becoming pretty uncreative by the end of it.

Still, I enjoyed revisiting all the characters I got to know and love in Frozen. Now that I got my dosage of grown-up Anna and Elsa actually being friends, I am kind of excited for Frozen 2, which has gone official as of only a few days ago I believe. I wasn’t sure how their friendship was going to affect the complexity of their relationship, but I liked how their friendship played out on the big screen. A sequel would probably test their relationship somehow, but I’d much rather see it not get broken up and focus on something else like Anna’s relationship with Kristoff. I’d even be down for a sequel providing Elsa with a love interest. It sounds like I really want a rom-com, don’t I?

FrozenFeverStill2

But for real, the fact that this sequel gets me pumped for Frozen 2 is probably all the directors could ask for. I wouldn’t say it’s worth the price of admission alone, but the movie that plays along with Frozen Fever is actually not bad.

CinderellaTitle

After I saw the mess that was Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland, I essentially gave up hope on the Disney live-actions of their animated classics. I didn’t see Maleficent, for example. Thing didn’t change when I saw the Cinderella trailers, and I became only more deflated about the whole enterprise after hearing Emma Watson landed the role of Belle in Disney’s scheduled live-action version of Beauty and the Beauty (oh, wait, people actually like this casting choice? more on this later…). From the trailers, it looked like Cinderella was going to use a darker, duller color palette, but that couldn’t be further from the truth. The film is gorgeously and vibrantly shot. Only for the ball does it darken its palette, which makes sense since it occurs at nighttime.

I thought the CGI mice were going to be absolutely laughable, but they turned out to be rather cute and distinctive. The little squeaks and mumbles they deliver is surprisingly enough to convey what they have to say. Still, less CGI could have been used, as some of the effects looked pretty fake to me, and even unnecessary.

Lol

Lol

I think what I really admired about this live-action adaption is how squarely it looked at the animated version and remained truthful to it. Even if some of the plot elements are silly now, director Kenneth Branagh doesn’t flinch to present the events as it was done by Walt Disney himself back in 1950. It’s extremely respectful to the source material, which makes it easier to forgive the occasional cheesy scene here and there.

CinderellaKit

Also, there’s a real sense that Branagh studied a lot of Disney prior to filming this. The rose garden the prince shows off to Cinderella reminded me a lot of the imagery to be found in Alice in Wonderland with the Queen of Hearts’ palace, and the blue dress Cinderella wears (which is NOT the silver one cartoon Cinderella wore to the ball) really reminded me of Belle’s outfit, which sticks out against the largely yellow, brown, and green color scheme of everything else. That dress Lily James wears while playing Cinderella is really stunning, by the way. Deserves a lot of credit from the costumes team.

This isn’t to say that Branagh’s version of Cinderella hasn’t made a few modernist touches, the likes of Frozen or Tangled where the female heroine is made stronger and where the love and first sight mentality is slanted. Most of these changes were justified, and actually made the film a bit deeper and sophisticated than Walt Disney’s film. The prince, for example, has a name, and Cinderella actually meets him prior to the ball; all changes that helped the screenplay out.

CinderellaDress

Still, this version didn’t manage to fully capture what I loved about the animated one. This one is a bit blunt about the whole message of its story (even for children) while Walt Disney’s was more implied. Disney’s was more dramatic as opposed to explicit, allowing scenes to swell up in emotion without the distraction of words. And the songs that made it a musical was not an accessory, but rather, necessary. And it shows in Branagh’s version. In fact, the few instances of singing utilized in Branagh’s Cinderella was actually really effective and even lovely, and made me wonder why there wasn’t more of it. Disney’s live-action version of Cinderella isn’t better than the animated classic.

CinderellaSilverDress

But I’d be lying if I wasn’t sympathetic about it. You can tell the team Disney put together for this tried really hard. And it darn near succeeded in making a thoroughly enjoyable live-action fairytale adaptation. And that gives me confidence in Disney’s upcoming live-action Beauty and the Beast, my favorite animated movie of all time. If only Emma Watson wasn’t set out to play Belle.

I’m probably going to get a lot of hate for saying this, but when has that ever stopped me? Disney casted Emma Watson to play Belle only because people love Emma Watson. In other words, it’s a marketing move. People think she’s beautiful, so duh, why not cast her as Belle, am I right?

Easiest decision ever, right?

Easiest decision ever, right?

EXCEPT THAT SHE CAN’T SING! Okay, it’s not like she CAN’T sing, but she’s not a professional! She’s never done it in a movie before, unless you count the little bit in Noah. And from my limited research on her, she has NO theater experience. Zero. Paige O’Hara was rocking the Broadway stage for more than 5 years prior to auditioning for the role of Belle. She auditioned against 500 of the best and brightest singers in New York. Is Disney telling us that Emma Watson is the best actress/singer they could find?!?

No. I don’t believe it. There’s only one explanation to me: money. They want to make money, and they believe Emma will bring the star power necessary for the film to succeed financially. Right off the bat, they are telling me that they don’t care about the art, but only the product. Beauty and the Beast is a flat-out musical. Alan Menken will tell you that. Howard Ashman, if he could rise from the grave, will tell you that. This casting choice tells me that Disney doesn’t understand why we loved Beauty and the Beast in the first place.

BatBDiamondEdition

But hey, at least they are making the live-action Beauty and the Beast a musical. And if Emma can provide the vocals, then I think this one actually has a chance of being the movie Branagh’s Cinderella was trying to be: a proper live-action adaptation of a Disney animated classic. More singing Disney! I want more singing.

Final Grade: C+ (79%)–Visually rivals the animated classic, but fails to fully function outside the musical format.

CinderellaCarriage

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Frozen Fever and Cinderella (2015)

  1. Glad you enjoyed it at least on some level.
    Do we know whether there will be the songs in the new Beauty and the Beast? I ask because up until now the live action versions have not included the songs which I will never understand but at least they aren’t destroying those along with their famous movies.
    I am also very pessimistic about the live action Beauty and the Beast. Casting doesn’t have anything to do with it. It’s having a CG Mrs Potts and Lumiere makes me want to jump off a cliff. I am highly skeptical of the whole project. Plus Jerry Orbach is dead so the voice of Lumiere will have to be a copycat. Sigh…
    Anyway, I think Cinderella has been told so many times I’m not as attached to only the Disney version so I’m hopeful it will be good (especially with the reviews).

    • Thanks for the comment smilingldsgirl! Hope my reply finds you in good spirit.

      Emma Watson said she is “terrified” at the thought of singing Something There, and she is taking voice lessons, so I am pretty confident this is actually a musical. I didn’t realize the side characters were going to be CGI, which is very frightening. I want to know what the Beast will look like. BatB will probably be more difficult to pull off, visually, than Cinderella for Disney. We’ll see if they can do it! I’ll definitely read your thoughts of Cinderella if you make such a post 🙂

  2. I honestly couldn’t care less about the live-action adaptations. Judging from “Alice in Wonderland” and “Maleficent,” it seems that they’re trying to add something new to the original films but end up going against them ( AIW making Wonderland more logica, Maleficent being the misunderstood heroine).

    • Hey Nat!

      It’s funny how Disney decided to produce live-actions of the animated movies I didn’t like first (AIW, Sleeping Beauty). I haven’t seen Maleficent, but I didn’t like the dark spin they gave to AIW. Cinderella, though it is more truthful, also gave it a spin by stripping it of its songs, which I thought bit them in the butt once again. Thanks for the comment!

      • Update from the future:
        I did see the movie, and I have to disagree about the animated version being better. I didn’t mind the lack of proper songs, and I really liked how the relationships between the characters are given more depth. I am not a fan of the talking mice from the original, so it was also nice to see them given a bit of subtlety with their communication.

      • Hey Nat! I think you are right in saying the relationships between the characters were given more depth. Especially between Cinderella and her parents and the prince and the king. I thought the mice in the original had a similar charm as the seven dwarfs in Snow White, so I enjoy the talking mice more than the non-talking ones, albeit more subtle as you point out. I’ve seen a few other adaptations of Cinderella in the past, and for some reason to me, nothing ever seems to surpass the original, which had a stellar soundtrack. I don’t think the songs are necessary for the story, but simply adds a level of enjoyment for me that is hard to replace. Thanks for commenting! Enjoyed reading your thoughts.

      • Glad to know!
        Also, I feel I should say something regarding music in movies, and TV shows. There’s an animation reviewer I watch on Youtube called the Mysterious Mr. Enter who doesn’t let his enjoyment of songs affect his rankings of TV episodes or movies, since (as he says, at least) music is subjective. Taking this into perspective, I’m wondering how songs should be factored when analyzing movies like this.

      • One of the reasons why movie reviewing is so difficult is because it is subjective. About the only things that aren’t subjective is the story, but even then, people can have different interpretations of it. If Mysterious Mr. Enter is trying to build an objective ranking of TV episodes and movies, I think he is simply missing the point. Movies are subjective, and should be reviewed as such. You can only dive so deep before needing to discuss subjective things, like soundtrack, visuals, characters, etc.

  3. Pingback: Trailer Review: Beauty and the Beast | taestful reviews

Feel free to comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s